Motion 4 – Structural Distinction: Sector Groups / Constituencies vs. Thematic Groups
⚑ SIMPLE MAJORITY — Statutes amendment required only if § 11 reference to “Sector Platforms” is updated

Motion text.

The General Assembly instructs the World Board to adopt a formal typology of Self-Organized Structures distinguishing between (A) Constituency Groups and (B) Thematic Groups, as defined above, and to establish clear criteria and requirements for recognising and approving the functioning status of each type. The World Board shall develop and publish these criteria within six months of this resolution and shall report on the reclassification of all existing structures to the next regular General Assembly.

Type A — Constituency Groups

Constituency Groups represent a major, distinct constituency directly within the organic value chain — for example organic farmers (INOFO), processors and traders, retailers, or consumers. Their defining characteristic is that they represent a broad, cross-regional membership constituency rather than a single thematic or technical focus. Constituency Groups are eligible for a reserved constituency seat on the World Board under § WB-1(b). They are full members of the Council and participate in co-decisions.

This would require approval of the GA through an amendment to Policy #23.

Type B — Thematic / Subsector Groups

Thematic Groups focus on a specific technical, sectoral, or issue-based domain — for example seeds, apiculture, aquaculture, animal husbandry, or technological innovation (current examples include IAHA, Seeds Platform, TIPI). They function primarily as knowledge and coordination networks within the IFOAM family. Thematic Groups are members of the Council and participate in its advisory and co-decision functions. They are not eligible for a constituency seat on the World Board.